You're quite right; my apologies for not having caught this before now.

 Given that this policy went into effect in November 2006, IMHO the
0.9.7 release that we're currently reviewing and voting on needs to be
updated to include the appropriate headers.



On 4/14/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The license headers we are using are in conflict with current
practice, as documented here:

There was a big discussion about this topic, but the above is
normative as of today. See the discussion in this message:

Bottom line, there should not be a copyright notice in the source
headers, only a license notice.

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

Reply via email to