Them's fightin' words. ;) But, I will say that I've tried giving it another shot of late just to make sure I'm not missing anything.
On 4/14/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And that's why vi is the best editor in the world :) On Apr 14, 2007, at 2:53 PM, Eddie O'Neil wrote: > Nice work -- 26 minutes by my count. :) > > Eddie > > > On 4/14/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> I just went ahead and manually updated the license headers, just to >> get this taken care of quickly. >> >> >> >> On Apr 14, 2007, at 2:30 PM, Craig L Russell wrote: >> >> > Hi Eddie, >> > >> > Removing Cliff from this discussion; sorry for the spam, Cliff, but >> > I recall you asking for it... ;-) >> > >> > On Apr 14, 2007, at 2:21 PM, Eddie O'Neil wrote: >> > >> >> Craig-- >> >> >> >> You're quite right; my apologies for not having caught this >> >> before now. >> >> >> >> Given that this policy went into effect in November 2006, IMHO >> the >> >> 0.9.7 release that we're currently reviewing and voting on needs >> >> to be >> >> updated to include the appropriate headers. >> >> >> >> Thoughts? >> > >> > The Release Manager needs to rescind the vote for 0.9.7 and read >> > the document below in detail. It contains references to scripts >> > that will update the license headers easier than manually editing >> > all the files. >> > >> > Craig >> >> >> >> Eddie >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 4/14/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> The license headers we are using are in conflict with current >> >>> practice, as documented here: >> >>> >> >>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html >> >>> >> >>> There was a big discussion about this topic, but the above is >> >>> normative as of today. See the discussion in this message: >> >>> >> >>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/ >> >>> 200612.mbox/% >> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>> >> >>> Bottom line, there should not be a copyright notice in the source >> >>> headers, only a license notice. >> >>> >> >>> Craig Russell >> >>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/ >> >>> products/jdo >> >>> 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> > >> > Craig Russell >> > Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/ >> products/jdo >> > 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! >> > >> >>
