Patrick Linskey wrote:
> FYI, once I commit a fix to OPENJPA-229, you'll be able to use the same
> class names once again. Sorry about that bug.

Understood. Right now I'm in the connection debate: toplink cannot use less
than 2, so each of my fat clients will have 3 open (1 it already has). So
the decision is still open. It appears that using a business model this way
is not something that is done often.
View this message in context:
Sent from the open-jpa-dev mailing list archive at

Reply via email to