Yup that's me :) Thanks for the suggestions--I closed those issues. Feel free to comment on issues that look ready to close or flag them on this mailing list and I can do another pass. I see there are a couple feature requests out there for GitHub to support proposed labels, which seems like it would be pretty helpful here...
Cheers, Bill On Wednesday, March 17, 2021 at 6:02:29 AM UTC-7 Andreas B wrote: > Hi Bill, > > thanks for the reply. For what it's worth, it's hard to tell from your > username here if you are Google folk yourself - I assume you are because > there's a similar username reviewing and merging over on GitHub. ;) > > Can you suggest a good way to tag those issues? I'm obviously not allowed > to add labels or anything, so it seems the only way would be to comment on > (sometimes very outdated) issues - which could be considered rude or have > the side effect of resurrecting off-topic discussions on those issues. > > Here are some random issues that could, IMO, be closed - just the easy > one's, not really having a detailed look when it comes to implementation > requests: > #424 - off-topic, just mentioning some map POI > #399 - off-topic; potential bug on plus.codes website, not with OLC > technology itself > #394 - seems as if I answered to OP's satisfaction last July > #387 - seems as if I answered to OP's satisfaction last March > #354 - problem with Google Map's implementation of choosing the proper > reference location while shortening; not a problem with OLC itself > > On Tuesday, March 16, 2021 at 7:22:18 PM UTC+1 Bill S wrote: > >> Hi Andreas, thanks for replying to that issue! >> >> Folks from Google monitor this project and approve pull requests, but >> mainly rely on the community for changes, so you're definitely welcome and >> encouraged to tag resolved issues. >> >> Cheers, Bill >> On Saturday, March 13, 2021 at 6:35:48 AM UTC-8 Andreas B wrote: >> >>> Hi everyone, especially Google people, >>> >>> is this project still actively maintained? I just replied to someone who >>> opened a new issue over on GitHub, and from a short survey it looks as if >>> many of the currently open issues are actually resolved (or never were >>> proper code issues to begin with) and can be closed. >>> >>> Is there any way I could help with that, for example by tagging issues >>> as "solved"? >>> >> -- Public site: http://www.openlocationcode.com/ Github project: https://github.com/google/open-location-code Demo site: http://plus.codes/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Plus Codes Community Forum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to open-location-code+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/open-location-code/220b1a7c-53b3-4239-9415-51b7b1f2caa1n%40googlegroups.com.
