Done, thanks again! On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 2:30 AM Andreas B <andr...@bocops.de> wrote:
> There has been some recent activity over on GitHub, so here's another pass > at issues that could probably be closed, or otherwise be dealt with: > > #65 - oldest open issue. Someone offered code translation to TCL, but this > ultimately went nowhere. User has since deleted his GitHub account, so it's > likely impossible to work out proper attribution etc. for the code made > available in a zip file > #126 - another issue with Google Maps or the plus.codes website, so can > only be decided one way or the other by a Googler > #134 - replied to, not actually a bug/issue > #155 - replied to, not actually a bug/issue > #248 - replied to, seems outside of OLC scope; Doug explicitly stated that > he doesn't see this progressing on your end > #358 - discussing the merits of OLC vs. other technologies; this > comparison is already a part of the documentation, so no current issue; > discussion seems to have run its course > #371 - Doug suggested rephrasing the Wiki, which has been accepted by > creator of the issue. Apparently, the Wiki can only be edited by the repo > owner(?), so please do and close this one as fixed. > On Wednesday, March 17, 2021 at 10:57:57 PM UTC+1 Bill S wrote: > >> Yup that's me :) >> >> Thanks for the suggestions--I closed those issues. Feel free to comment >> on issues that look ready to close or flag them on this mailing list and I >> can do another pass. I see there are a couple feature requests out there >> for GitHub to support proposed labels, which seems like it would be pretty >> helpful here... >> >> Cheers, Bill >> >> On Wednesday, March 17, 2021 at 6:02:29 AM UTC-7 Andreas B wrote: >> >>> Hi Bill, >>> >>> thanks for the reply. For what it's worth, it's hard to tell from your >>> username here if you are Google folk yourself - I assume you are because >>> there's a similar username reviewing and merging over on GitHub. ;) >>> >>> Can you suggest a good way to tag those issues? I'm obviously not >>> allowed to add labels or anything, so it seems the only way would be to >>> comment on (sometimes very outdated) issues - which could be considered >>> rude or have the side effect of resurrecting off-topic discussions on those >>> issues. >>> >>> Here are some random issues that could, IMO, be closed - just the easy >>> one's, not really having a detailed look when it comes to implementation >>> requests: >>> #424 - off-topic, just mentioning some map POI >>> #399 - off-topic; potential bug on plus.codes website, not with OLC >>> technology itself >>> #394 - seems as if I answered to OP's satisfaction last July >>> #387 - seems as if I answered to OP's satisfaction last March >>> #354 - problem with Google Map's implementation of choosing the proper >>> reference location while shortening; not a problem with OLC itself >>> >>> On Tuesday, March 16, 2021 at 7:22:18 PM UTC+1 Bill S wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Andreas, thanks for replying to that issue! >>>> >>>> Folks from Google monitor this project and approve pull requests, but >>>> mainly rely on the community for changes, so you're definitely welcome and >>>> encouraged to tag resolved issues. >>>> >>>> Cheers, Bill >>>> On Saturday, March 13, 2021 at 6:35:48 AM UTC-8 Andreas B wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi everyone, especially Google people, >>>>> >>>>> is this project still actively maintained? I just replied to someone >>>>> who opened a new issue over on GitHub, and from a short survey it looks as >>>>> if many of the currently open issues are actually resolved (or never were >>>>> proper code issues to begin with) and can be closed. >>>>> >>>>> Is there any way I could help with that, for example by tagging issues >>>>> as "solved"? >>>>> >>>> -- > Public site: http://www.openlocationcode.com/ > Github project: https://github.com/google/open-location-code > Demo site: http://plus.codes/ > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "Plus Codes Community Forum" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/open-location-code/5TuJ4rnc3bc/unsubscribe > . > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > open-location-code+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/open-location-code/8893a0e0-a990-4469-a047-cf03ce30969en%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/open-location-code/8893a0e0-a990-4469-a047-cf03ce30969en%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- Public site: http://www.openlocationcode.com/ Github project: https://github.com/google/open-location-code Demo site: http://plus.codes/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Plus Codes Community Forum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to open-location-code+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/open-location-code/CANaMn1BCuLFfdsyFjmW6iPhoTSC6ZWoFhcek-qPgc6uHhz9U9w%40mail.gmail.com.
