Marcelo Vanzin wrote: > So it seems to imply that what controls the license version and that other > versions are allowed is the copyright header in each source file; I checked > and > all sources seem to say "no later version", so unless I'm misinterpreting the > LGPL text, I don't think there's an issue.
Marcelo, yes that makes sense, and the source code therefore is LGPL 2.1 (no later version). Thanks for the clarification. -denis ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ open-vm-tools-devel mailing list open-vm-tools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-vm-tools-devel
