Tracker item #2301228, was opened at 2008-11-16 14:15 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mvanzin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=989708&aid=2301228&group_id=204462
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: libraries Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: John Brooks (aspecial) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Build fails with --disable-multimon in unity Initial Comment: The build of version 2008.10.10 with --disable-multimon (no xinerama support) and with Unity enabled fails in lib/unity/unityPlatformX11.c due to extensive use of the header, functions, and structures from xinerama not contained within #ifndef NO_MULTIMON - making a build with unity and without xinerama impossible. Due to use of structures from xinerama, it's too much for me to resolve myself. If this isn't something that is intended to be fixed (i.e. a dependency will be made on xinerama), let me know and i'll get the gentoo ebuild updated accordingly - currently it tries to use --disable-multimon whenever xinerama isn't available/enabled. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Marcelo Vanzin (mvanzin) Date: 2009-01-21 14:57 Message: This was actually fixed in the 2008.12.24 release. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John Brooks (aspecial) Date: 2008-11-19 03:24 Message: Sounds good. I've filed a gentoo bug to this effect, to have a dependency added for xinerama when unity is enabled. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Marcelo Vanzin (mvanzin) Date: 2008-11-17 19:56 Message: Hi John, To the best of my knowledge, Unity depends on the multimon functionality, so I guess you'll need to update the ebuild. I'll keep this bug open to add a similar check in the configure script itself. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=989708&aid=2301228&group_id=204462 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ open-vm-tools-devel mailing list open-vm-tools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-vm-tools-devel
