I agree with steve, -Wno-extra option should be added.
Please continue with the review.
Thanks,
zhuqing
2010/9/2 Steve Ellcey <s...@cup.hp.com>
> On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 13:30 -0700, Jian-Xin Lai wrote:
>
> > I can not find any document about -Wno-extra though gcc accept it. It
> > looks like meaningless.
> > Please remove the -Wno-extra and modify the messages.
>
> If GCC accepts -Wno-extra shouldn't we accept -Wno-extra? I think that,
> in general, GCC doesn't document the -Wno-* or -fno-* negative form of
> flags.
>
> Steve Ellcey
> s...@cup.hp.com
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:
Show off your parallel programming skills.
Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd
_______________________________________________
Open64-devel mailing list
Open64-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open64-devel
