In keeping with the gcc option document, modify the option messages as
follows.
Can gatekeeper help review this, thanks.
Index: osprey/driver/OPTIONS
===================================================================
--- osprey/driver/OPTIONS (revision 3334)
+++ osprey/driver/OPTIONS (working copy)
@@ -1470,6 +1470,10 @@
"Do not warn about suspicious declarations of main"
-Wmissing-braces ; Cc f self
"Warn about possibly missing braces around initialisers"
+-Wextra ; Cc f self
+ "Enable some extra warning flags that are not enabled by -Wall"
+-Wno-extra ; Cc f self
+ "Disable extra warning flags that are enabled by -Wextra"
-Wno-missing-braces ; Cc f self
"Do not warn about possibly missing braces around initialisers"
-Wmissing-declarations ; Cc f self
@@ -1944,6 +1948,8 @@
"File tells Fortran compiler how to transform ids into linker
symbols"
-undef ; Cc,as,CPP CPP self
""
+-Wmissing-include-dirs ; Cc,as,CPP CPP self
+ "Warn if a user-supplied include directory does not exist"
%%% Code Generation Options
-fcall-saved-%s ; Cc NONE ""
""
zhuqing
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 11:12 AM, 朱庆 <zqing1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry, forgot to add the patch.
>
> Index: osprey/driver/OPTIONS
> ===================================================================
> --- osprey/driver/OPTIONS (revision 3334)
>
> +++ osprey/driver/OPTIONS (working copy)
> @@ -1470,6 +1470,10 @@
> "Do not warn about suspicious declarations of main"
> -Wmissing-braces ; Cc f self
>
> "Warn about possibly missing braces around initialisers"
> +-Wextra ; Cc f self
> + "Warn about some extra warning flags that are not enabled by
> -Wall"
> +-Wno-extra ; Cc f self
> + "Do not warn about some extra warning flags that are not enabled
> by -Wall"
> -Wno-missing-braces ; Cc f self
> "Do not warn about possibly missing braces around initialisers"
> -Wmissing-declarations ; Cc f self
> @@ -1944,6 +1948,8 @@
> "File tells Fortran compiler how to transform ids into linker
> symbols"
> -undef ; Cc,as,CPP CPP self
> ""
> +-Wmissing-include-dirs ; Cc,as,CPP CPP self
> + "No such file or directory"
> %%% Code Generation Options
> -fcall-saved-%s ; Cc NONE ""
> ""
>
> Thanks,
> zhuqing
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 3:12 PM, 朱庆 <zqing1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I agree with steve, -Wno-extra option should be added.
>> Please continue with the review.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> zhuqing
>>
>> 2010/9/2 Steve Ellcey <s...@cup.hp.com>
>>
>> On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 13:30 -0700, Jian-Xin Lai wrote:
>>>
>>> > I can not find any document about -Wno-extra though gcc accept it. It
>>> > looks like meaningless.
>>> > Please remove the -Wno-extra and modify the messages.
>>>
>>> If GCC accepts -Wno-extra shouldn't we accept -Wno-extra? I think that,
>>> in general, GCC doesn't document the -Wno-* or -fno-* negative form of
>>> flags.
>>>
>>> Steve Ellcey
>>> s...@cup.hp.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:
Show off your parallel programming skills.
Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd
_______________________________________________
Open64-devel mailing list
Open64-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open64-devel
