I looked at this patch and I think it's OK. but I'm not the gate keeper for
makefiles.
Can global keepers approve this patch?
2010/9/7 David Coakley <dcoak...@gmail.com>
> Could a gatekeeper review the attached Makefile patch?
>
> The main purpose of the patch is to make it easier to build on Ubuntu
> systems, where bash is not the default shell. The patch includes
> rewrites of two rules that were using bash-specific operators. After
> this patch, you no longer need to set the SHELL environment variable
> before building on Ubuntu.
>
> Also, the patch changes 'make clean' to be more complete -- it was
> only cleaning half of the libraries on x86-64.
>
> Finally, there is a fix for a build problem with my recent changes to
> the libhugetlbfs Makefile (r3326). Thanks,
>
> -David Coakley / AMD Open Source Compiler Engineering
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:
>
> Show off your parallel programming skills.
> Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd
> _______________________________________________
> Open64-devel mailing list
> Open64-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open64-devel
>
>
--
Regards,
Lai Jian-Xin
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployment and
accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Open64-devel mailing list
Open64-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open64-devel
