This is complicated legal stuff. Can we do the least complicated way
(legal-wise)
Sun

On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Gilmore, Doug <doug.gilm...@amd.com> wrote:
> The old license on intrn_entry.def was BSD, which with my patch is
> would be changed to GPLv2.  Both are compatible with Open64.
>
> My point of the change is that intrn_entry.def could be considered to
> be a derived work, and if so, the copyright notices and license should
> reflect that of the previous work.  Note the license on the previous
> work was GPLv2.
>
> I don't think there are any licensing issues with the patch that
> implements the fix.  The issue is whether intrn_entry.def is a derived
> work or not.  If people are comfortable in saying that it was not a
> derived work, which gave us the freedom at the time of commit r1764 to
> set the license on to intrn_entry.def to BSD, then no change of
> license is needed.
>
> I attached the patch associated with commit r1764.  Keep in mind
> that the patch is against the tree branches/merge08, where
> the PSC 3.2 (and others) merge was done.
>
> I added another patch to the bug report with no license change, but
> I did add a copyright notice for the change that I just added.
>
> If people think that my interpretation of copyright law is too
> strict then we can go ahead and apply that patch instead.
>
> Doug
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sun Chan [mailto:sun.c...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 4:46 PM
>> To: Gilmore, Doug
>> Cc: open64-devel
>> Subject: Re: [Open64-devel] review request for a fix to bug 628,
>> backend assertion with popcount builtin
>>
>> I suggest someone check the license compatibility (or whatever) before
>> the checkin. This is likely beyond gatekeeper capability
>> Sun
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Gilmore, Doug <doug.gilm...@amd.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Sun Chan [mailto:sun.c...@gmail.com]
>> >> Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 4:22 PM
>> >> To: Gilmore, Doug
>> >> Cc: open64-devel
>> >> Subject: Re: [Open64-devel] review request for a fix to bug 628,
>> >> backend assertion with popcount builtin
>> >>
>> >> This fix would have been in the merge I coordinated but never
>> "checked
>> >> in".
>> > Right.
>> >> I assume there is no copy right issues since it is before the
>> >> change to  gpl3.0
>> >> Sun
>> > Per the last comment that I added to the bug, what is unusual with
>> this patch
>> > is that license on one of the files was changed from BSD to GPLv2,
>> since
>> > it is safer to consider this file addition as a derived work.
>> >
>> > Doug
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Gilmore, Doug <doug.gilm...@amd.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Again, the bug fix is attached to the patch.
>> >> >
>> >> > https://bugs.open64.net/show_bug.cgi?id=628
>> >> >
>> >> > Could someone take a look at this when they have the chance?
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks,
>> >> >
>> >> > Doug
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ---
>> >> ---------
>> >> > Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App & Earn a Chance To Win
>> $500!
>> >> > Tap into the largest installed PC base & get more eyes on your
>> game
>> >> by
>> >> > optimizing for Intel(R) Graphics Technology. Get started today
>> with
>> >> the
>> >> > Intel(R) Software Partner Program. Five $500 cash prizes are up
>> for
>> >> grabs.
>> >> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intelisp-dev2dev
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > Open64-devel mailing list
>> >> > Open64-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open64-devel
>> >> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App & Earn a Chance To Win $500!
Tap into the largest installed PC base & get more eyes on your game by
optimizing for Intel(R) Graphics Technology. Get started today with the
Intel(R) Software Partner Program. Five $500 cash prizes are up for grabs.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intelisp-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Open64-devel mailing list
Open64-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open64-devel

Reply via email to