Let me remind you of Fred's mail to you, me and a couple of other OSG members. The gist of that mail talked about concerns and current limitations of OSG and what OSG is working on to alleviate the limitations so that fruitful discussion can move forward with Pathscale. Sun
2011/4/1 "C. Bergström" <cbergst...@pathscale.com>: > Sun Chan wrote: >> >> Christopher, >> This is misleading at the very least. OSG is in the process of trying >> to figure out what is the right and legal way to work with Pathscale. >> And you know this too. I don't know why you keep saying in public OSG >> is unwilling to work with Pathscale. This might have taken longer than >> you want, I feel the same way too, but it's not an excuse to make >> false accusation. >> > > Ummm... the last thing I'm aware from OSG is > ------- >> >> Hi Christopher, >> >> I don't think this discussion is converging >> and would like to stop it at this point. >> Thanks. >> >> - Suneel > > ------ > This is the last email received in my attempt to remove obstacles from > Open64 sharing code with PathScale and vice versa. The OSG isn't > transparent at all and how am I supposed to know what's going on in private. > In the meantime please state facts and give me/us and update instead of > just trying to say I'm wrong. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Create and publish websites with WebMatrix Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself; WebMatrix provides all the features you need to develop and publish your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf _______________________________________________ Open64-devel mailing list Open64-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open64-devel
