Mike Vermeulen wrote: > > This is possibly not copyrightable, but didn't you get the message - > > It's probably best for Open64 to not import PathScale code (regardless > > if it's license compatible) > > Christopher, > > > One can read from your statement "didn't you get the message" > an implication that somehow there is something new or different > here. Please don't be so dense - If you have a test case and it's so trivial then just debug and fix the problem. Really what's the time/cost difference between isolating some small fix like this from the 3.3 tarball vs just fixing it?
The greater point I was trying to make is both projects can collaborate if a sincere effort is made to resolve blocking issues. (political or otherwise) Open64/AMD can cherry pick 1 bug fix at a time from a 2 year old tarball or collaborate and get a hundreds.... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Create and publish websites with WebMatrix Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself; WebMatrix provides all the features you need to develop and publish your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf _______________________________________________ Open64-devel mailing list Open64-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open64-devel
