> I don't know if John T Kohl is reading, but I was under the > impression that > his "vicegrips" client was basically that. Such a thing > wouldn't be hard in > any case. Might be nice to put together a developer-friendly 'AFS Client' library. i.e. something similar to the C/Perl libraries that exist for ftp. This way, it would be VERY easy to develop things like websecure, or command line AFS clients, without having to worry about all the details. -- Nathan _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/openafs-devel
- [OpenAFS-devel] datagrams really arent big enough? Chas Williams
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] datagrams really arent big... Default
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] datagrams really arent big... Chas Williams
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] datagrams really arent big... Default
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] datagrams really arent big... Chas Williams
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] datagrams really arent big... Derrick J Brashear
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] datagrams really arent big... Chas Williams
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] datagrams really arent big... Derrick J Brashear
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] datagrams really arent big... Neulinger, Nathan R.
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] datagrams really arent big... Derek Atkins
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] datagrams really arent... Derrick J Brashear
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] datagrams really arent big... Derek Atkins
- RE: [OpenAFS-devel] datagrams really arent big... Neulinger, Nathan R.
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] datagrams really arent big... Default
- RE: [OpenAFS-devel] datagrams really arent big... Daniel Clark/CAM/Lotus
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] datagrams really arent big... Chas Williams
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] datagrams really arent big... Default
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] datagrams really arent... Chas Williams
