--On Wednesday, November 08, 2000 11:34:24 AM -0500 Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Derrick J Brashear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I don't know if John T Kohl is reading, but I was under the impression >> that his "vicegrips" client was basically that. Such a thing wouldn't >> be hard in any case. > > FYI, vicegrips was written by John F Carr, not John T Kohl. My apologies to Mr Carr, then, if he's reading. My memory fails me again. -D _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/openafs-devel
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] datagrams really arent big enou... Default
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] datagrams really arent big enou... Chas Williams
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] datagrams really arent big enou... Default
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] datagrams really arent big enou... Chas Williams
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] datagrams really arent big enou... Derrick J Brashear
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] datagrams really arent big enou... Chas Williams
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] datagrams really arent big enou... Derrick J Brashear
- RE: [OpenAFS-devel] datagrams really arent big enou... Neulinger, Nathan R.
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] datagrams really arent big enou... Derek Atkins
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] datagrams really arent big... Derrick J Brashear
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] datagrams really arent big enou... Derek Atkins
- RE: [OpenAFS-devel] datagrams really arent big enou... Neulinger, Nathan R.
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] datagrams really arent big enou... Default
- RE: [OpenAFS-devel] datagrams really arent big enou... Daniel Clark/CAM/Lotus
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] datagrams really arent big enou... Chas Williams
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] datagrams really arent big enou... Default
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] datagrams really arent big... Chas Williams
