On 29 Mar 2001, Sam Hartman wrote:
> >>>>> "Derrick" == Derrick J Brashear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> Derrick> Old platforms are considered "grandfathered" and no
> Derrick> default change will be applied to them.
>
>
> Do we really want to have granularity of 2.2.16 in the port name? It
> seems that a reasonable port that works on 2.2.16 is also likely to
> work on 2.2.17
>
> I'm concerned about proliferation of files in config. There is
> already way too much data duplicated among Linux config/param files.
The idea was that this would happen concurrent with autoconf and fix that
problem. Sadly the autoconf effort is not yet that advanced.
-D
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/openafs-devel
