Could you be more specific? What do you have in mind when you say "fully dynamic?" That admins (or even users) could define their own @ variables on the fly? That was my interpretation. I don't see the point of expanding beyond @sys unless we're going to allow arbitrary variable names. I imagine the sytax being something like "fs setvarlink sys i386_obsd28." Then something like "fs getvarlink" would list them all. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/openafs-devel
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] DRAFT: New sysname standard Derek Atkins
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] DRAFT: New sysname standard Garance A Drosihn
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] DRAFT: New sysname standard Nathan Neulinger
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] DRAFT: New sysname standard Todd M. Lewis
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] DRAFT: New sysname standard eichin-oa
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] DRAFT: New sysname standard Garance A Drosihn
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] DRAFT: New sysname standard Jim Rees
- RE: [OpenAFS-devel] DRAFT: New sysname standard Neulinger, Nathan
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] DRAFT: New sysname standard Jim Rees
- RE: [OpenAFS-devel] DRAFT: New sysname standard Jim Rees
- RE: [OpenAFS-devel] DRAFT: New sysname standard Neulinger, Nathan
- RE: [OpenAFS-devel] DRAFT: New sysname standard Ted McCabe
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] DRAFT: New sysname standard Jim Rees
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] DRAFT: New sysname standard Derek Atkins
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] DRAFT: New sysname standard Ted McCabe
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] DRAFT: New sysname standard Garance A Drosihn
- RE: [OpenAFS-devel] DRAFT: New sysname standard Garance A Drosihn
- RE: [OpenAFS-devel] DRAFT: New sysname standard Garance A Drosihn
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] DRAFT: New sysname standard Jim Rees
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] DRAFT: New sysname standard Derek Atkins
