The proposed variant is based on environment variables... I certainly didn't propose that, and I don't think anyone else did either. I did describe the Domain/OS system, which uses environment variables, but I also pointed out that the security model on a typical unix-like system would require some other mechanism. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/openafs-devel
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] DRAFT: New sysname standard Jim Rees
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] DRAFT: New sysname standard Jim Rees
- RE: [OpenAFS-devel] DRAFT: New sysname standard Neulinger, Nathan
- RE: [OpenAFS-devel] DRAFT: New sysname standard Ted McCabe
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] DRAFT: New sysname standard Jim Rees
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] DRAFT: New sysname standard Derek Atkins
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] DRAFT: New sysname standard Ted McCabe
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] DRAFT: New sysname standard Garance A Drosihn
- RE: [OpenAFS-devel] DRAFT: New sysname standard Garance A Drosihn
- RE: [OpenAFS-devel] DRAFT: New sysname standard Garance A Drosihn
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] DRAFT: New sysname standard Jim Rees
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] DRAFT: New sysname standard Derek Atkins
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] DRAFT: New sysname standard Derek Atkins
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] DRAFT: New sysname standard Jeffrey Hutzelman
