Ted McCabe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a lot of trouble picturing how the implicit approach would
> make sense to a user.
Really? The automounter, which does implicit mounting, has been in
wide use for many years and users seem to understand it. Similarly,
'attach' (which is more like a manual automounter) is just as 'hard'
to understand. Indeed, I can see arguments either way.
>From a security standpoint, I think the decision to be implicit or
explicit should be a run-time option. As a user, I'd very much like
the implicit method. That would certainly solve the 'FileViewer'
problem because only previously-accessed cells would show up in
a listing of /afs.
> --Ted
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key available
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
