Is 120M the actual partition size of the amount of available
FS space after you've laid the filesystem onto the partition?
Also keep in mind that the 'cache size' does not take into
account the CacheItems and VolumeItems files, so you have to
reduce that out as well.
Assuming your cache "partition" size is 120M, the available space
would be closer to 100M, so I would only feel comfortable with an 80M
cache. YMMV.
-derek
David Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Derek Atkins wrote:
> >This is never a problem if your cache is on its own partition and you
> >tell the cache manager what size the partition is. In fact, that
> >is the recommended operating procedure. What are you doing? ;)
>
> Actually, this is only _almost_ true. We run 100Meg caches in 120 Meg partitions on
>several hundred workstations and occassionally (several times a month?) see the
>"partition full -- decrease cachesize" message, with its accompanying cache
>corruption.
>
> Dave
>
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key available
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
