Re: [OpenAFS-devel] suggested feature...

[David Thompson]

Derek Atkins wrote:
>Is 120M the actual partition size of the amount of available
>FS space after you've laid the filesystem onto the partition?
>Also keep in mind that the 'cache size' does not take into
>account the CacheItems and VolumeItems files, so you have to
>reduce that out as well.
>
>Assuming your cache "partition" size is 120M, the available space
>would be closer to 100M, so I would only feel comfortable with an 80M
>cache.  YMMV.

This is a standard cache partition size:

Filesystem           1k-blocks      Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/hda9               124427     89819     28184  77% /var/vice/cache

I won't believe that ext2 has ~20% overhead.  There are clearly situations where, for 
brief periods of time, the cache limit does get exceeded.

Dave


_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel