i see some people have been working with rx, so i thought i would ask (again) why RX_MAX_FRAGS cant be increased to 6 instead of 4. as it stands, with RX_MAX_FRAGS = 4, the largest datagram will be about 5688. on our network, the physical mtu is 9234. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] RX_MAX_FRAGS (yet again) chas williams
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] RX_MAX_FRAGS (yet again) Nickolai Zeldovich
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] RX_MAX_FRAGS (yet again) chas williams
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] RX_MAX_FRAGS (yet agai... Nickolai Zeldovich
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] RX_MAX_FRAGS (yet ... chas williams
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] RX_MAX_FRAGS ... Nickolai Zeldovich
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] RX_MAX_FRAGS (yet again) Jim Rees
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] RX_MAX_FRAGS (yet again) Derrick J Brashear
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] RX_MAX_FRAGS (yet again) Nickolai Zeldovich
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] RX_MAX_FRAGS (yet again) chas williams
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] RX_MAX_FRAGS (yet again) Nickolai Zeldovich
