On Fri, 28 Sep 2001, Jim Rees wrote: > If your mtu is much bigger than 8KB you will want to make sure you've got at > least afs 3.5 on each end, and you'll want to increase RX_JUMBOBUFFERSIZE. > Even with an 8KB mtu you can get some increase in performance by increasing > this, because you'll be getting more data per rx packet, and will have to do > less jumbogram unpacking.
And incidentally it looks like there's a problem with how jumbograms are implemented (which I don't really care for but I'm not going to redo it). rxi_ReceiveDataPacket ends up calling queue_Scan as packets are pulled out of jumbograms because call->rnext being being updated on rx_Read, and new packets from jumbograms aren't being generated as a result of rx_Read. So despite being the next sequence number we don't "expect" them and hence do a lot of extra work. I'm working on a fix now. -D _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
