On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Adam Thornton wrote: > How hard would it be to make OpenAFS rely on the > more-or-less-standard-by-now set of includes that OpenSSL and most > (Linux, anyway) distributions provide?
Relying on external packages violates a constraint we've been working under for a while, but: > It mostly seems to be traceable to differing sets of header files and > libraries; the XDR headers in rpc are one set whose different > interpretations cause SuSE 7.0+patches on S/390 to refuse to build Samba > with the --with-afs option this should be fixable; it's been fixed for all the other platforms which had similar problems > for another, AFS, OpenSSL, and MIT K5 all > appear to use mutually incompatible DES headers. I haven't looked in a while but last I did the types may have been different but the net result was the same. Has something changed? I have ADM building against AFS, Heimdal, OpenSSL, SASL and libcyrus, and yes, all being linked into one binary. I did need to explore this, and honestly I don't remember what the answer was. -D _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
