At 12:46 PM -0600 2/13/02, Adam Thornton wrote: >How hard would it be to make OpenAFS rely on the >more-or-less-standard-by-now set of includes that OpenSSL and most >(Linux, anyway) distributions provide? > >I ask, because I've been having the very devil of a time getting AFS to >build on a SuSE 7.3 Pro system, or to get AFS to play nicely with Samba >2.2.3 built with the --with-afs configuration option.
I have not tried Samba 2.2.3 yet, but the --with-afs option under Samba 2.2.2 is basically pointless. We run samba 2.2.2 on a linux machine, and we did not include the --with-afs option. The problem is there were a lot of changes made to samba since the original AFS support was added to samba, and most of the people doing that samba work have no contact with AFS. So, the AFS support has fallen apart as the rest of samba gets improved. Perhaps things have improved now that OpenAFS is available, and more people might be running AFS/OpenAFS clients. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior Systems Programmer or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
