Where you have suggested changing for (side_effects);
with
for (side_effects) { /* empty */ }
I would prefer this:
for (side_effects)
;
I think it will survive re-indentation better, and is a little more
human-readable because it takes up an extra line.
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
