I don't know. Probably not, as not much has changed on Linux (which is why I
haven't rebuilt the rc5 RPMS with rc8). But you're on your own trying to do
that. I was just suggesting you use the rc5 RPMs.
-derek
Quoting Pucky Loucks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
So I just downloaded the source for openafs-1.4.0-rc8 and that
openafs.spec file, needed patches and src files, I'm building rpm for
the latest code. Will I run into an issue? i.e. have the krb or
other patches changed? (just building rpms now)
thanks,
Pucky
On 19-Oct-05, at 2:57 PM, Derek Atkins wrote:
http://dl.openafs.org/dl/candidate/1.4.0-rc5/
Quoting Pucky Loucks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I have not tried the rpms for RHEL... .but I would love too.. any
url for them?
Pucky
On 19-Oct-05, at 1:58 PM, Derek Atkins wrote:
Pucky,
Have you tried using the 1.4.0rc RPMS for RHEL?
-derek
Quoting Jeffrey Altman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
OpenAFS currently uses the Linux numbering scheme in which odd minor
releases are unstable and even minor releases are stable. Therefore,
1.4.0 is the new stable branch and after 1.4.0 is announced a 1.5.0
unstable series will begin.
I can't answer your linux question but I can point out that 1.4.0-rc8
supercedes 1.3.87 by nine releases. You should be using 1.4.0- rc8 and
not 1.3.87 for any work you are currently doing.
Jeffrey Altman
Pucky Loucks wrote:
I'm having an issue with openafs-1.3.87. I've compiled it on the
following type of system:
$ Linux H2STBiznode02 2.4.21-32.0.1.ELsmp #1 SMP Thu Jun 30 10:52:34
CDT 2005 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
when I try to start openafs (during a client install) I get the
following:
AFS module /usr/vice/etc/modload/ libafs-2.4.21-32.0.1.ELsmp.mp.o does
not exist. Not starting AFS.
My question is... how do I tell ./configure to build me a smp version
of the openafs module? I've done this:
$ ./configure --enable-transarc-paths --enable-smp
but I'm not sure if that is anywhere close to being correct.
also when 1.40 is final and out will it be the current stable release
or will it be unstable release. the reason I ask is I'm going to be
going production with openafs in the next 3 weeks and I'm
wondering if
I should do openafs-1.2.13 or openafs-1.3.87 or openafs-1.4.
thanks,
Pucky
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key available
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key available
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key available
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
