Christof Hanke wrote: > Ok, I see. If the LogLevel is very high you don't want to slow down the > Server unnecessarily. > So, what about introducing a second macro called SLog or whatever beside > the ViceLog one ?
Why? The name of the macro is just that, a name. It only has meaning to the developers and we are well aware that simply because it is called "ViceLog" does not mean that the log entries are written to the same file as the file server log entries. If the consensus is that leaving the macro as "ViceLog" is too confusing, then the proper thing to do would be to rename it to something general and alter the file server code to use the new name. Jeffrey Altman
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
