Jeffrey Altman wrote:
Why? The name of the macro is just that, a name. It only has meaning
to the developers and we are well aware that simply because it is called
"ViceLog" does not mean that the log entries are written to the same
file as the file server log entries.
If the consensus is that leaving the macro as "ViceLog" is too
confusing, then the proper thing to do would be to rename it to
something general and alter the file server code to use the new name.
Well, it's not too confusing for people who know the code a bit, but it
might put off people who read it for the first time.
I don't really care if we're using a second macro or rename the ViceLog
one, but I see your point.
If it has a change of being accepted I'll be willing to rework my patch
including your suggestion.
Jeffrey Altman
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
