On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, David Howells wrote:
Troy Benjegerdes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can you get this person to say this on a public mail list, so I can
flame him for being an obstructionist idiot?
Feel free. I'm sure he ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) would enjoy flaming you back.
Should I smell conspiracy in the fact that he is a contributor to kAFS?
In particular it could be construed easily as "I will screw your competing
implementation". Maybe there's a better story than that. I'd like to hear
it.
However, the net result would probably be counterproductive for OpenAFS.
Sure. And Troy can't commit, isn't an elder, and thus can't really speak
for the project, either, and yet, lots of people who don't have had their
comments interpreted as holding some weight and things have been
counterproductive for it. So, if he can basically cause us problems by
speaking his opinion, that speaks for the fragility of what's going on.
I do wonder if it'd be possible to get IBM to dual licence OpenAFS (IPL/GPL).
Obviously that's been covered. But, if they did it would cover only v1.0.
Not very useful.
Derrick
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
