In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,Garrett Wollman w rites: >Doesn't matter, so long as each PAG gets a distinct memory location. >In a real implementation, it would probably be a pointer to a >reference count.
negative. it really should just be an indentifier that is used to group together objects. there should not be identifier reuse. pointers to kernel memory are very likely to be reused (mostly due to the slab allocator). since you might pass these identifiers to a user process you cant let them repeat since you have no idea how long a user process might hold onto these things. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
