"C. Alex. North-Keys" wrote:
>Is there anyone working on a PAG system that doesn't squat in the group 
>ID space?  Several sites (ours included) have seen failures relating to 
>the use of group permissions when numeric groups in the auxilliary group 
>ID list cannot be mapped back to group names, even on files outside of 
>the AFS space.

Yes, and under linux 2.6 there are also failures in simply _using_ group 
permissions on uid/gid based file systems, because the PAG breaks the linux 2.6 
assumption that the group list is sorted.

Dave

_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel

Reply via email to