"Jeffrey Hutzelman" wrote: >Bear in mind, our primary motivation in doing something other than using group >s is not to make PAG's invisible, but to have them at all. Making the extra g >roups go away and solving the scarcity issue are both important but secondary >goals.
Would the resulting semantics be more similar to uid/gid handling or session/process group handling? Or something else? Dave _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
