Our problem was solved by reducing the interface mtu from 9000 to 1500. I'm still trying to determine whether rx or the net was misbehaving. Rx knew the correct path mtu, according to the fields in the acks. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] .35 sec rx delay bug? Jim Rees
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] .35 sec rx delay bug? Sven Oehme
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] .35 sec rx delay bug? chas williams - CONTRACTOR
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] .35 sec rx delay bug? chas williams - CONTRACTOR
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] .35 sec rx delay bug? Rainer Toebbicke
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] .35 sec rx delay bug? Derrick J Brashear
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] .35 sec rx delay bug? Rainer Toebbicke
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] .35 sec rx delay bug? chas williams - CONTRACTOR
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] .35 sec rx delay bug? Tom Keiser
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] .35 sec rx delay bug? Rainer Toebbicke
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] .35 sec rx delay bug? Jim Rees
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] .35 sec rx delay bug? Derrick J Brashear
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] .35 sec rx delay bug? chas williams - CONTRACTOR
- RE: [OpenAFS-devel] .35 sec rx delay bug? Buhrmaster, Gary
- RE: [OpenAFS-devel] .35 sec rx delay bug? Derrick J Brashear
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] .35 sec rx delay bug? Rainer Toebbicke
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] .35 sec rx delay bug? Harald Barth
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] .35 sec rx delay bug? Rainer Toebbicke
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] .35 sec rx delay bug? Derrick J Brashear
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] .35 sec rx delay bug? Jim Rees
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] .35 sec rx delay bug? Derrick J Brashear
