On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, Rainer Toebbicke wrote:
Harald Barth wrote:
Derrick J Brashear wrote:
Did you have jumbograms enabled? If you disable them, but leave the mtu at
9000, are things better? I bet they are.
Derick wrote that things get better when jumbograms are _dis_abled, did he?
Euh... I bet he meant with big MTUs. Turning jumbograms off on a standard
Actually, it should cause some degradation always because of how the
jumbogram gets unrolled on the receive end. It may be overwhelmed by
issues with window size, but, I'm considering things which can be fixed in
code efficiency, not in network efficiency (that should also be consider
but isn't what I am speaking to)
I'd rather just send our best guess at path mtu minus header payloaded
packets, and not jumbograms.
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
