Yes, clearly that is correct.
Matt
Jim Rees wrote:
Matt Benjamin wrote:
Respectfully, I haven't seen this stylistic preference in Unix source
code or style guidelines (eg, Rob Pike).
style(9) calls for using parens. But most of the existing afs code leaves
out the parens, and I think it's best to be consistent with what we have.
And as Jeffrey notes, it's best not to put in a bunch of style changes in a
patch.
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
--
Matt Benjamin
The Linux Box
206 South Fifth Ave. Suite 150
Ann Arbor, MI 48104
http://linuxbox.com
tel. 734-761-4689
fax. 734-769-8938
cel. 734-216-5309
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
