On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, Jim Rees wrote:
Matt Benjamin wrote:
Respectfully, I haven't seen this stylistic preference in Unix source
code or style guidelines (eg, Rob Pike).
style(9) calls for using parens. But most of the existing afs code leaves
out the parens, and I think it's best to be consistent with what we have.
Agreed.
And as Jeffrey notes, it's best not to put in a bunch of style changes in a
patch.
Yes, this is absolutely critical. We periodically have had "stlye flag
days" e.g. the retabification of all the source, but we don't really want
to take these piecemeal.
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
