Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > should /usr/bin/pagsh and /usr/share/man/man1/pagsh.1.gz from > openafs-client be renamed so they don't clash with krbafs-utils on > Fedora/RHEL?
You should stop using krbafs-utils and switch to Kerberos v5. Debian handles this problem through alternatives, which is the right solution short of getting rid of all the old K4 stuff. I don't think the pagsh in OpenAFS should be renamed, given that it's the arguably canonical version. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list OpenAFS-devel@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
