Axel Thimm wrote: > On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 02:34:56PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: >> Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> should /usr/bin/pagsh and /usr/share/man/man1/pagsh.1.gz from >>> openafs-client be renamed so they don't clash with krbafs-utils on >>> Fedora/RHEL? >> You should stop using krbafs-utils and switch to Kerberos v5. > > That is out of my hands, this is a package that is shipped on Fedora > and RHEL proper and any user can install it. Whether it is sane or not > is another question, but asking Red Hat to remove this to fix the > above will not work, espcially not from released distributions. > > (FWIW it's not on RHEL5 anymore, but still on F7, F8 and of course the > elder distros)
I agree. Its not our responsibility to rename our commands after 20 years because a vendor decided to package up conflicting functionality and make it available to their end users. Doing so would only further confuse our user base.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
