On Jan 11, 2008 3:31 PM, Jeffrey Hutzelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --On Friday, January 11, 2008 02:13:49 PM -0600 "Douglas E. Engert" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This afternoon, did a cvs update, and found three new problems. > > All three are because the Solaris compiler considers a void > > function returning a value as an error. > > Well, I would expect any compiler to produce at least a warning for that. > IMHO this code is integrated it needs to be cleaned up to the point where > not only does it build on all of our platforms, but it doesn't > substantially increase the number of warnings, at least in modules that > have already been cleaned up in that respect. > i suspect this is a 1.5.x version rxk5 1.5.x divergence issue.
