--On Friday, January 11, 2008 02:38:33 PM -0600 "Douglas E. Engert"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
--On Friday, January 11, 2008 02:13:49 PM -0600 "Douglas E. Engert"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This afternoon, did a cvs update, and found three new problems.
All three are because the Solaris compiler considers a void
function returning a value as an error.
Well, I would expect any compiler to produce at least a warning for
that. IMHO this code is integrated it needs to be cleaned up to the
point where not only does it build on all of our platforms, but it
doesn't substantially increase the number of warnings, at least in
modules that have already been cleaned up in that respect.
I agree, and I am testing a branch, using a non-gcc compiler. The three
modules where all in the last few weeks to the branch.
There are a lot of warning too, if you want I can send them as well.
Not to me, please; this isn't my code. I'd suggest sending to Marcus
off-list, if he's ready for that sort of thing.
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
