Derrick Brashear wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Jason Edgecombe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
--On Monday, April 28, 2008 06:40:31 PM -0400 Derrick Brashear
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tune the AFS timeouts so that the user get's failure messages more
quickly?
If by "tune the AFS timeouts" you mean "make them smaller", don't do
that.
The right thing to do is to use the network stack to notice, if at all
possible, that you have no network.
Exactly so.
Ok, so what is the consensus on what to do for the N800?
Right now, I have the following:
1. notify afsd of new interfaces like Darwin
2. cause all of the servers to be re-checked
Should anything be done when a network interface is dropped? Should I just
let afsd handle that?
Linux *should* dtrt to the network stack.
Should I worry about the captive portal case where the net is blocked, then
unblocked a few minutes later? I was thinking of monitoring that somehow and
telling afsd to recheck things.
How?
My idea of polling with rxdebug would probably just duplicate what afsd
does already, so I guess not.
Jason
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
