On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Steven Jenkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We've been doing some work with src/tests recently, with a view to > adding more functional tests, and we are thinking about adding an > additional framework in there besides the existing 'run-tests', which > would over time replace 'run-tests'. A richer testing harness would > make it easier to exclude certain tests, automate reporting, etc.
Yes, please. Another thing which would be nice is a split of "things to test in a throwaway cell" as the original setup works versus a switch thrown to test in an existing cell. > Any objections to that? > > Second, given that much of that code is in Perl, any objection to > using one of the Perl Test::* frameworks to manage that? None here. Derrick _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
