Derrick Brashear wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Steven Jenkins
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We've been doing some work with src/tests recently, with a view to
adding more functional tests, and we are thinking about adding an
additional framework in there besides the existing 'run-tests', which
would over time replace 'run-tests'. A richer testing harness would
make it easier to exclude certain tests, automate reporting, etc.
Yes, please. Another thing which would be nice is a split of "things
to test in a throwaway cell" as the original setup works versus a
switch thrown to test in an existing cell.
Any objections to that?
Second, given that much of that code is in Perl, any objection to
using one of the Perl Test::* frameworks to manage that?
None here.
Derrick
I have been using the Test::More perl framework. I haven't done enough
to really need to organize things yet, but most of my stuff is targeted
at use in a existing cell. M one test so far uses the current directory
for writing. How should we pass the scratch directory to the tests? An
environment variable, perhaps?
Jason
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
