-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi,
Looks like this issue is also RT 119118, filed Oct. 3. I support the suggestion. However, wouldn't the preferred name be "struct afs_conn"? With regard to the gmake story, I'm suspicious. I'm told gmake is the 'correct' make, for the solaris builds, but for me libafs.o is not built without an equivalent change to the declaration of struct conn. The libafs.nonfs.o is built, however, possibly your friend doesn't use the nfs translator and didn't notice? (btw, didn't jake do some work with solaris function prototypes recently? don't see them in RT...) Matt Joel wrote: > I agree, ``conn'' is probably not the best choice, especially inside a > commonly included header file. > > Interestingly enough, I was trying to think of reasons this compiled > fine for a friend of mine, but not me. Since this is a new OpenSolaris > install, GNU make wasn't around, so typing make invoked Sun's make. > Using gmake made everything compile fine. I haven't really looked into > why this is, but it worked. > > Joel > - -- Matt Benjamin The Linux Box 206 South Fifth Ave. Suite 150 Ann Arbor, MI 48104 http://linuxbox.com tel. 734-761-4689 fax. 734-769-8938 cel. 734-216-5309 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJajSwJiSUUSaRdSURCFDeAJsGhln4HBJcFJ6gR0risZ9mg0NkxACfQDSE jFde5EHSE7rUaUYD34YriaE= =X89W -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
