On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Matt Benjamin <[email protected]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hi, > > Looks like this issue is also RT 119118, filed Oct. 3. I support the > suggestion. However, wouldn't the preferred name be "struct afs_conn"? > > With regard to the gmake story, I'm suspicious. I'm told gmake is the > 'correct' make, for the solaris builds, but for me libafs.o is not built
There is no 'correct' make; our Makefiles are (supposed to be) portable. If /usr/ccs/bin/make, gmake, or dmake fail to parse, then it's a bug. -Tom _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
