On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Ken Hornstein<[email protected]> wrote: >>I think that historically, head and 1.5.x have simply scared >>developers into using 1.4 as a base. I recall a period of close to a >>year (maybe more) where head wouldn't even build on Linux when rxtcp >>was in there, and 1.5 was usually not that much better. > > rxtcp was always on a branch; if you selected that branch, you should have > known what you were getting in to. > > --Ken
You're right that it wasn't rxtcp, I think it was bringing-rx-into-21st-century-20060504 which was later taken out of head with taking-rx-back-into-the-20th-century-20061228. My point was not the specific breakage (there were surely other things as well), but more the fact that at least on Linux, head was not buildable for quite a long time. Marc _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
