Marc Dionne wrote:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Ken Hornstein<[email protected]> wrote:
I think that historically, head and 1.5.x have simply scared
developers into using 1.4 as a base. I recall a period of close to a
year (maybe more) where head wouldn't even build on Linux when rxtcp
was in there, and 1.5 was usually not that much better.
rxtcp was always on a branch; if you selected that branch, you should have
known what you were getting in to.
--Ken
You're right that it wasn't rxtcp, I think it was
bringing-rx-into-21st-century-20060504 which was later taken out of
head with taking-rx-back-into-the-20th-century-20061228.
My point was not the specific breakage (there were surely other things
as well), but more the fact that at least on Linux, head was not
buildable for quite a long time.
Do the tinderbox test boxes help to alleviate this?
Thanks,
Jason
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
