Steven Jenkins wrote: > While I don't necessarily disagree that the additional information > would be useful to Windows clients (or cache managers in general), > that is orthogonal to our request, which, as Ali's mail states, is > about the vos command, which uses UV_ListOneVolume, and, in turn, > AFSVolListOneVolume.
Similar arguments apply. There are third party AFS volume mgmt tools that have been developed which will be unaware of the meaning of the new states. In order to prevent those tools from breaking new RPCs should be implemented. In any case, any discussion of new values that are going to be published on the wire is a discussion for afs3-standardization. Jeffrey Altman _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
