On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Derrick Brashear <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Matt W. Benjamin <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> I would generally agree with almost all of this, except, probably removing 
>> --enable-fast-restart?
>
> In a demand attach universe, this isn't really useful anymore

Agreed.

>
>> Since, as you note, there are sites which actually do rely on this, are you 
>>in fact meaning to say that the option would exist, but not be mentioned in 
>>the usage?  I guess I'd also like to hear from Steven on pthreaded-ubik.  It 
>>appears that it actually isn't 100% stable, but is close, and apparently it's 
>>issue(s) are difficult to provoke.
>
>
> What we have in the code base definitely has bugs; Are there fixes
> which have not made it back upstream?

Not significant fixes, no, but there are some minor ones.

At the moment, I know of no one interested in running pthreaded ubik,
so there's a bit of chicken and egg -- i.e., I know what fixes need to
be done, but need some people willing to run it and give a green light
on it (or to kick me and tell me it's still broken).  And I'd need to
carve out some time to work on it.

Steven
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel

Reply via email to